Butler v. Foster

246 A.D. 680
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum. On account of the form of the motion we are not passing upon the various counts of the complaint separately, but are treating the complaint as a whole. We think that sufficient is shown to constitute a cause of action when the complaint is liberally construed in favor of the pleader and that it is an action against a trustee or agent acting in a fiduciary capacity and that persons against whom the defendants’ wrong was done are not shown to have had actual knowledge of the facts upon which their right depends -until after the death of the executor Costello and that the Statute of Limitations is not, therefore, a defense as matter of law. This ruling does not prevent the defendants from pleading the Statute of Limitations. All concur. (The order denies motion to dismiss complaint in an action to recover funds held in trust lost in purchase of stocks.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [156 Misc. 250.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. Foster, 246 A.D. 680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 680 (Butler v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O 'Hayer v. Honore de St. Aubin
30 A.D.2d 419 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
City of Albany v. McMorran
34 Misc. 2d 304 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Decker v. People
23 Misc. 2d 90 (New York County Courts, 1959)