Butler v. Egge

32 A. 402, 170 Pa. 239, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1392
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 18, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 114·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Our examination of this record has failed to convince us that there was any error in refusing to continue the preliminary injunction. There is nothing that would justify us in sustaining either of the assignments of error.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. Egge, 32 A. 402, 170 Pa. 239, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1392 (Pa. 1895).

32 A. 402 (Butler v. Egge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Council of Associated Building Trades
99 Pa. Super. 100 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
State v. Beaird
34 La. 104 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1882)