Butler v. Construction Industry Licensing Board

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Butler v. Construction Industry Licensing Board

177 So. 3d 1050, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17158, 2015 WL 7157897

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 16, 2015

DocketNo. 1D15-1479

StatusPublished

This text of 177 So. 3d 1050 (Butler v. Construction Industry Licensing Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Butler v. Construction Industry Licensing Board, 177 So. 3d 1050, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17158, 2015 WL 7157897 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant failed to demonstrate reversible error in the Construction Industry Licensing Board’s final order approving Appellee Tauja Smith’s claim for restitution from the Florida Homeowners’ Construction Recovery Fund because Appellant’s argument that the circuit court judgment giving rise to Smith’s recovery fund claim is “fraudulent” and the result of an ongoing conspiracy against Appellant between Smith, the Board, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, and local building officials is beyond the proper scope of this proceeding. See § 489.141, Fla. Stat. (2012). Accordingly, we affirm the final order.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant failed to demonstrate reversible error in the Construction Industry Licensing Board’s final order approving Appellee Tauja Smith’s claim for restitution from the Florida Homeowners’ Construction Recovery Fund because Appellant’s argument that the circuit court judgment giving rise to Smith’s recovery fund claim is “fraudulent” and the result of an ongoing conspiracy against Appellant between Smith, the Board, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, and local building officials is beyond the proper scope of this proceeding. See § 489.141, Fla. Stat. (2012). Accordingly, we affirm the final order.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 So. 3d 1050, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17158, 2015 WL 7157897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-construction-industry-licensing-board-fladistctapp-2015.