Butler v. City of Ashland

231 P. 155, 113 Or. 72, 1924 Ore. LEXIS 15
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided November 5, 1924·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

COSHOW, J.

Section 548, Or. L., prescribes:

“A judgment or decree may be reviewed as prescribed in this chapter, and not otherwise. An order affecting a substantial right, and which in effect determines the action or suit so as to prevent a judgment or decree therein, or an interlocutory decree in a suit for the partition of real.property, defining the rights of the parties to the suit and directing sale or partition, or a final order affecting a substantial *74 right, and made in a proceeding after judgment or decree, or an order setting aside a judgment and granting a new trial, for the purpose of being reviewed, shall be deemed a judgment or decree.”

In this suit no judgment or decree has been entered. Final disposition of the suit has not ■ been made in the Circuit Court. It has been frequently held that an order overruling or sustaining a demurrer is not appealable. Such an order may be reviewed on • appeal taken from the judgment , or decree, but the order itself is not a final determination of the case and is not appealable: Weeks v. Snider, 107 Or. 138, 141 (214 Pac. 334).

The appeal is premature and must therefore be dismissed. Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. City of Ashland, 231 P. 155, 113 Or. 72, 1924 Ore. LEXIS 15 (Or. 1924).

231 P. 155 (Butler v. City of Ashland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton
601 P.2d 1254 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
Ter Har v. Backus
473 P.2d 143 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1970)
Sandblast v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission
161 P.2d 919 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1945)
Charleston v. Norman's Estate
78 P.2d 346 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1938)
Barker v. Sonner
294 P. 1053 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1930)