Butler v. Church of the Immaculate Conception

77 Ky. 540, 14 Bush 540, 1879 Ky. LEXIS 19
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 18, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 77 Ky. 540 (Butler v. Church of the Immaculate Conception) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. Church of the Immaculate Conception, 77 Ky. 540, 14 Bush 540, 1879 Ky. LEXIS 19 (Ky. Ct. App. 1879).

Opinion

JUDGE ELLIOTT

delivered the opinion oe the court.

These suits sought a recovery against appellee for moneys borrowed of the plaintiffs in its name by its agent P. Guilfoyle. The amounts deposited were evidenced by a writing, executed by Guilfoyle, and by it a promise is made to return the money on demand of the plaintiffs, with six per cent interest. The writing is filed, but as it is not the foundation of the action, it is not such a writing as dispenses with an affidavit to plaintiffs’ petition.

Plaintiffs filed their suits, not having sworn to their petitions, and the defendant, after it had filed its demurrer, and it had been overruled, and it had filed its answer, was permitted to withdraw it, and then on its motion a rule was awarded against appellants to swear to their petitions, and their failure to do so was punished by a dismissal of their suits.

This ruling of the court was erroneous. This court has decided substantially that after answer filed, by the defendant it is too late to insist that the plaintiff shall swear to his pleading, because by the failure to make the question till after answer the defendant has waived his right to make it.

In this case the defendant had not only demurred to the plaintiffs’ petitions, but had answered to the merits of their claims. The plea that plaintiff has not sworn to his petition is in the nature of a plea in abatement, which at the common law could never be insisted on unless aptly relied on before an answer was put in to the merits of the controversy.

Wherefore the judgments áre reversed, and each of these cases, which were heard together, is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horton v. Horton
92 S.W.2d 373 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1936)
Bellamy v. Krebs
281 S.W. 187 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 Ky. 540, 14 Bush 540, 1879 Ky. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-church-of-the-immaculate-conception-kyctapp-1879.