Butler v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

94 S.E. 279, 21 Ga. App. 318, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 578
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1917
Docket8795
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 279 (Butler v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 94 S.E. 279, 21 Ga. App. 318, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 578 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Butler sued the Central of Georgia Railway Company, alleging substantially as follows: On a designated night he went to the depot of the defendant for the purpose of putting four negro passengers on the train to send them to Chattanooga, there to work in the factory of the plaintiff’s employer. After being admitted through the gate at the depot, he approached an agent of the company and asked him where the negro coach was, explaining that he wanted to put four negro laborers he had with him on that coach; and the coach was pointed out to him by the agent. He thereupon went with the negroes and entered the coach, and while there the train started on its trip. He immediately went toward the platform by which he entered the coach and found that the outer vestibule doors of the coach had been closed. He then rushed through that coach and found the doors next to the steps closed at that end. He finally found the same agent to whom [319]*319he had spoken while at the depot, closing the vestibule doors at the rear end of the third coach of the train. He requested this agent to open the door for him, so that he could get off the train, stating that he had no ticket and that he did not expect to go on the train and could not leave Macon; that the said agent refused to do so, but upon a second request he did open the door, and the plaintiff attempted to alight from the train, and was injured in so doing. He alleges that the place where he tried to alight appeared to be smooth, but that it was dark, and for this reason he could not see very well, and was unfamiliar'With the place and could not tell at what rate of speed the train was going. Held, that the facts pleaded in the petition do not show that the plaintiff received his injuries by any negligence on the part of the defendant, its agents or servants. It was, therefore, not error to sustain a general demurrer to the petition, and to dismiss the suit. Blodgett v. Bartlett, 50 Ga. 354; Southern Ry. Co. v. Nichols, 135 Ga. 15 (5) (68 S. E. 789) ; Ricks v. Ga. So. & Fla. Ry., 118 Ga. 259 (45 S. E. 268) ; Johns v. Ga. Ry. & El. Co., 133 Ga. 525 (66 S. E. 269); Gosnell v. Central of Ga. Railway Co., 17 Ga. App. 67 (2) (86 S. E. 90).

Decided November 16, 1917. Action, for damages; from Bibb superior court — Judge Matbews. March 9, 1917. . Davenport Guerry, Warren Roberts, for plaintiff. Jordan & Lane, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ricks v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.
45 S.E. 268 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Johns v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.
66 S.E. 269 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Southern Railway Co. v. Nichols
68 S.E. 789 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Gosnell v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
86 S.E. 90 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 279, 21 Ga. App. 318, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-central-of-georgia-railway-co-gactapp-1917.