Butler v. Butler

53 S.E. 646, 73 S.C. 402, 1906 S.C. LEXIS 201
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 3, 1906·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The brothers and sisters and the nephews and nieces of Silas- Butler brought this action for partition against his widow. Partition in kind having been found impracticable, the land was sold by order of the Court. *403 The master reported that attorneys for plaintiff should be allowed a fee of $2-50 for their services in the partition suit, to be paid out of the proceeds of sale of land before distribution. Upon exception to this recommendation of the master, the Circuit Judge held there was no warrant for the allowance of a fee to the attorneys for the plaintiffs out of the common fund. The precise point was decided in Westmoreland v. Martin, 24 S. C., 238.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler v. Butler, 53 S.E. 646, 73 S.C. 402, 1906 S.C. LEXIS 201 (S.C. 1906).

53 S.E. 646 (Butler v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erwin v. Williams
18 S.E.2d 598 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1942)
Neal v. Neal
79 S.E. 849 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)