Butler v. Butler
This text of 579 P.2d 780 (Butler v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[314]*314OPINION
In 1976, the parties obtained a divorce and were awarded joint legal custody of their two minor children. Subsequently, appellant moved to modify the divorce decree to obtain sole custody of the children. The district court, relying solely on the “tender years” doctrine announced in Peavey v. Peavey, 85 Nev. 571, 460 P.2d 110 (1969), granted custody to respondent.
Although appellant attacks the validity and constitutionality of Peavey, we need not, and therefore do not, consider his contentions. In Adams v. Adams, 86 Nev. 62, 464 P.2d 458 (1970), we ruled that the standards set forth in Murphy v. Murphy, 84 Nev. 710, 447 P.2d 664 (1968), govern modification of child custody and Peavey was not controlling in such circumstances.
Accordingly, we reverse the district court order and remand the case for proceedings, consistent with this opinion. See Murphy v. Murphy, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 P.2d 780, 94 Nev. 313, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-butler-nev-1978.