Butler v. Bates

7 Cal. 136
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 7 Cal. 136 (Butler v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. Bates, 7 Cal. 136 (Cal. 1857).

Opinion

Terry, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.

The plaintiff seeks, by a mandamus, to compel the defendant, who is State Treasurer, to pay, in the order of their registration, certain Comptroller’s warrants, issued in payment of labor and material furnished in the erection of the State-prison wall.

The act amending an act concerning the office of Comptroller, passed April, 1854, provides, that “no warrants shall be drawn on the Treasury, except there be an unexhausted specific appropriation to meet the same.” There having been no appropriation by law for the erection of the prison-wall, the act of the Comptroller in issuing such warrants, was in direct contravention of a positive statute, and the warrants are absolutely void.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raymond v. Christian
74 P.2d 536 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Harrison v. McCormick
11 P. 456 (California Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Cal. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-bates-cal-1857.