Butler Farms, Inc. v. Hinson

152 So. 720, 113 Fla. 860, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1754
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 5, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on motion to dismiss after briefs have been filed by the respective parties.

In considering the motion to dismiss it has been necessary for us to consider the record herein and also the briefs *861 filed by the respective parties. Having done this, we have arrived at the conclusion that no reversible error is disclosed by the record and that, therefore, the order appealed from should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler Farms, Inc. v. Hinson, 152 So. 720, 113 Fla. 860, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1754 (Fla. 1934).

152 So. 720 (Butler Farms, Inc. v. Hinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Treat v. State Ex Rel. Mitton
163 So. 883 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Dayton v. State Life Insurance
154 So. 208 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)