Butler Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Turner

Ohio Supreme Court

Butler Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Turner

852 N.E.2d 1217, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1470

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 24, 2006

Docket1999-2262

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 852 N.E.2d 1217 (Butler Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Butler Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Turner, 852 N.E.2d 1217, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1470 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

On May 31, 2000, this court suspended respondent from the practice of law for six months and stayed the suspension on conditions, including the condition that during the stay respondent shall work with an attorney-mentor to be named by relator. Prior to issuance of that order, the court, on April 5, 2000, in Supreme Court Case No. CLE-1999-16670, suspended respondent from the practice of law for failure to comply with the continuing legal education requirements of Gov.Bar R. X. At that time, respondent was ordered to immediately cease the practice of law.

Respondent has now satisfied all requirements for reinstatement from his Gov.Bar R. X suspension. In a separate order issued on this date, the court ordered respondent reinstated to the practice of law in CLE-1999-16670. Upon consideration thereof,

Respondent is ordered to work with an attorney-mentor for six months from the date of this order. It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this order, relator file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s mentor. It is further ordered that at the end of the six-month period, relator shall file a report with this court indicating whether respondent has complied with the conditions set forth in the order of May 31, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On May 31, 2000, this court suspended respondent from the practice of law for six months and stayed the suspension on conditions, including the condition that during the stay respondent shall work with an attorney-mentor to be named by relator. Prior to issuance of that order, the court, on April 5, 2000, in Supreme Court Case No. CLE-1999-16670, suspended respondent from the practice of law for failure to comply with the continuing legal education requirements of Gov.Bar R. X. At that time, respondent was ordered to immediately cease the practice of law.

Respondent has now satisfied all requirements for reinstatement from his Gov.Bar R. X suspension. In a separate order issued on this date, the court ordered respondent reinstated to the practice of law in CLE-1999-16670. Upon consideration thereof,

Respondent is ordered to work with an attorney-mentor for six months from the date of this order. It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this order, relator file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s mentor. It is further ordered that at the end of the six-month period, relator shall file a report with this court indicating whether respondent has complied with the conditions set forth in the order of May 31, 2000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

852 N.E.2d 1217, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-cty-bar-assn-v-turner-ohio-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack