Butler & Co. v. McCall

46 S.E. 647, 119 Ga. 503, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 253
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 13, 1904·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Candler, J.

The consideration of a contract is always open to inquiry in a suit for its enforcement. The answer of the defendants as amended, setting up that the note sued on was for the purchase-price of certain sawmill timber, that part of the land conveyed had no timber on it at all, that as to other portions a paramount outstanding title existed in other parties, and that the defendants had never been in possession thereof, was good as a plea of failure of consideration, and should not have been stricken on demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler & Co. v. McCall, 46 S.E. 647, 119 Ga. 503, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 253 (Ga. 1904).

46 S.E. 647 (Butler & Co. v. McCall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Williams
249 S.E.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Holiday Homes, Inc. v. Bragg
208 S.E.2d 608 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)