Butler & Co. v. McCall

46 S.E. 647, 119 Ga. 503, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 253
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 13, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 46 S.E. 647 (Butler & Co. v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler & Co. v. McCall, 46 S.E. 647, 119 Ga. 503, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 253 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Candler, J.

The consideration of a contract is always open to inquiry in a suit for its enforcement. The answer of the defendants as amended, setting up that the note sued on was for the purchase-price of certain sawmill timber, that part of the land conveyed had no timber on it at all, that as to other portions a paramount outstanding title existed in other parties, and that the defendants had never been in possession thereof, was good as a plea of failure of consideration, and should not have been stricken on demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Williams
249 S.E.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Holiday Homes, Inc. v. Bragg
208 S.E.2d 608 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 S.E. 647, 119 Ga. 503, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-co-v-mccall-ga-1904.