Butler, Cal Maurice

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 12, 2013
DocketWR-77,838-02
StatusPublished

This text of Butler, Cal Maurice (Butler, Cal Maurice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler, Cal Maurice, (Tex. 2013).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-77,838-01 & WR-77,838-02

EX PARTE CAL MAURICE BUTLER, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. F-06-65524-V & F-06-65525-V IN THE 292ND DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts

of aggravated assault and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment on each count. His appeal in cause

number F-06-65525-V was dismissed. Butler v. State, No. 05-07-00968-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas

2007, no pet.).

In a single ground, Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal. We remanded

these applications on August 22 and October 31, 2012. After holding a live evidentiary hearing, the

trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we grant Applicant 2

out-of-time appeals. We agree. Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time appeals

of the judgment of convictions in cause numbers F-06-65524-V and F-06-65525-V from the 292nd

District Court of Dallas County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give

written notices of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain meaningful appeals.

Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is

indigent. If he is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately

appoint an attorney to represent him on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the

sentences had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that,

should Applicant desire to prosecute appeals, he must take affirmative steps to file written notices

of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: June 12, 2013 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Butler, Cal Maurice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-cal-maurice-texcrimapp-2013.