Buterbaugh v. Trans Union, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 12, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-01196·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 | ERIC BUTERBAUGH, Case No. 1:22-cv-01196-JLT-EPG 1] Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 12 V. (ECF No. 29) 13 | BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE, et al., 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 29) 17 || pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), dismissing Plaintiff's claims against 1g | Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware! without prejudice. In light of the voluntary dismissal, and as 19 Defendant has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action has been 0 terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(@), and has been dismissed without prejudice. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 9 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case.

23 | IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 os | Dated: _ April 12, 2023 [spe ey — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 ' Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware is the only remaining defendant in this action. (See ECF No. 28).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buterbaugh v. Trans Union, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Buterbaugh v. Trans Union, LLC (Buterbaugh v. Trans Union, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)