Home/Supreme Court/Bute v. Quinn

Bute v. Quinn

429 U.S. 1027, 97 S. Ct. 651
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 13, 1976
DocketNo. 76-283
StatusPublished
Cited by65 cases

This text of 429 U.S. 1027 (Bute v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bute v. Quinn, 429 U.S. 1027, 97 S. Ct. 651 (1976).

Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neely v. Benefits Review Board
139 F.3d 276 (First Circuit, 1998)
Pete Wilson, Governor Californians for Senator Pete Wilson Leo McCarthy McCarthy for U.S. Senator v. A. H. Belo Corp. Kxtv Great Western Broadcasting Corporation Channel 40 Licensee Renaissance Communications Corp. Fidelity Television CBS Christ Craft Industries Inc. Nbc Subsidiary Inc. Knbc Tv Nbc Inc. Ktla Inc. Chronicle Broadcasting of San Francisco Inc. Kron Tv Ktvu Inc. Cox Enterprises McGraw Broadcasting Company Inc. Kgtv San Joaquin Communications Corp. Ksee Meredith Broadcasting Inc. Kmst Retlaw Broadcasting Ktxl, Krbk Koplar Communications of California Koplar Communications Inc. Kcbc National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Kjeo Kget Acerkley Communications, Inc., Pete Wilson v. A.H. Belo Corp.
87 F.3d 393 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
The People of the State of California, Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia, Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission, Bellsouth Corporation, Respondents-Intervenors. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Maryland People's Counsel, Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission, Voice-Tel Enterprises, Inc., Respondents-Intervenors. State of New York, Maryland People's Counsel, Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission, Voice-Tel Enterprises, Inc., Respondents-Intervenors. American Newspaper Publishers Association ("Anpa"), Bellsouth Corporation, Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission
39 F.3d 919 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Sprint Corp. v. Evans
818 F. Supp. 1447 (M.D. Alabama, 1993)
California v. Federal Communications Commission
905 F.2d 1217 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
People of the State of California Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, North American Telecommunications Association ("Nata") National Association of Regulatory Commissioners ("Naruc") Missouri Public Service Commission ("Mpsc"), Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission, Pacific Bell, Respondents-Intervenors. People of the State of California Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, North American Telecommunications Association ("Nata") National Association of Regulatory Commissioners ("Naruc"), Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission, Ameritech Operating Companies (Illinois Bell Telephone Co., Indiana Bell Telephone Co. Incorp., Michigan Bell Telephone Co., Ohio Bell Telephone Co., Wisconsin Bell, Inc.), Respondents-Intervenors. People of the State of California Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Communications Commission, People of the State of New York, North American Telecommunications Association ("Nata") Pacific Bell, Nevada Bell, Pactel Communications Companies, and Pacific Telesis Group Iowa Utilities Board, Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies ("Bell Atlantic"), Respondents-Intervenors. People of the State of New York, Pacific Bell, Nevada Bell, Pactel Communications Companies, and Pacific Telesis Group Iowa Utilities Board North American Telecommunications Association ("Nata"), Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission, American Telephone and Telegraph, Respondents-Intervenors. State of Michigan Michigan Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
905 F.2d 1217 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
883 F.2d 104 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
Illinois Bell Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission
883 F.2d 104 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
880 F.2d 422 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)
State Corp. Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
787 F.2d 1421 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
State Corporation Commission Of The State Of Kansas v. Federal Communications Commission
787 F.2d 1421 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
New York State Commission on Cable Television v. Federal Communications Commission
749 F.2d 804 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Satellite Business Systems, Isa Communications Services, Inc., Aeronautical Radio, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Missouri Public Service Commission, Arizona Corporation Commission, New York State Department of Public Service, Southern Pacific Communications Company, State of Michigan, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Intervenors. The People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Satellite Business Systems, Isa Communications Services, Inc., Aeronautical Radio, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Southern Pacific Communications Company, Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Intervenors
746 F.2d 1492 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Glictronix Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
603 F. Supp. 552 (D. New Jersey, 1984)
Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.
744 F.2d 118 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc. v. Public Utilities Commission of Maine
742 F.2d 1 (First Circuit, 1984)
Virginia State Corporation Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
737 F.2d 388 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)
Virginia State Corp. Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
737 F.2d 388 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)
Alascom, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Isa Communications Services, Inc., Intervenor. People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Isa Communications Services, Inc., Intervenor. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Southern Pacific Communications Co., Isa Communications Services, Inc., Gte Telenet Communications Corporation, Satellite Business Systems, U.S. Telephone and Telegraph Corporation, Tymnet Inc., MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Intervenors. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Isa Communications Services, Inc., Intervenor
727 F.2d 1212 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Alascom, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
727 F.2d 1212 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 U.S. 1027, 97 S. Ct. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bute-v-quinn-scotus-1976.