Butchers' & Drovers' Bank of St. Louis v. McDonald
130 Mass. 264, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 65
Opinion
The plaintiff being a corporation de facto, and the defendant having contracted with it as such, the legality of its organization cannot be impeached by him when sued upon his contract. Appleton Ins. Co. v. Jesser, 5 Allen, 446. Commissioners of Douglas v. Bolles, 94 U. S. 104.
Exceptions overruled, with double costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Butchers' & Drovers' Bank of St. Louis v. McDonald, 130 Mass. 264, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 65 (Mass. 1881).
130 Mass. 264 (Butchers' & Drovers' Bank of St. Louis v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bancroft v. Cook
162 N.E. 691 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1928)
Kleckner v. Turk
63 N.W. 469 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)