Butcher v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.

207 S.W.3d 128, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1253, 2006 WL 2471603
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2006·No. Nos. WD 65783, WD 65817·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Brimberry appeals from the partial summary judgment denying his breach of contract claims against Enterprise Leasing Company of DFW (Enterprise DFW) and its parent corporation, Enterprise Reni>-A-Car Company, and his tor-tious interference claim against Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. Brimberry also appeals from the dismissal of his claims, against Enterprise DFW and its parent corporation, for alleged violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butcher v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 207 S.W.3d 128, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1253, 2006 WL 2471603 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

207 S.W.3d 128 (Butcher v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.