Bustinaby v. Crotte

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Bustinaby v. Crotte

34 Misc. 779, 68 N.Y.S. 814

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Misc. 779 (Bustinaby v. Crotte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bustinaby v. Crotte, 34 Misc. 779, 68 N.Y.S. 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Blanchard, J.

This case was tried before one of the justices of the Municipal Court and a jury. The weight of evidence and the merits of the case are clearly on the side of defendant and the verdict of the jury is well sustained. The refusal of the court to admit in evidence the carbon copy of the alleged agreement, to which an exception was duly taken, does not warrant a reversal of the judgment on that ground. If such carbon copy had been marked for identification and made a part of the return, so that its contents might be considered, a different conclusion might have been reached.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Andrews, P. J., and O’Gorman, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blanchard, J.

This case was tried before one of the justices of the Municipal Court and a jury. The weight of evidence and the merits of the case are clearly on the side of defendant and the verdict of the jury is well sustained. The refusal of the court to admit in evidence the carbon copy of the alleged agreement, to which an exception was duly taken, does not warrant a reversal of the judgment on that ground. If such carbon copy had been marked for identification and made a part of the return, so that its contents might be considered, a different conclusion might have been reached.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Andrews, P. J., and O’Gorman, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Misc. 779, 68 N.Y.S. 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bustinaby-v-crotte-nyappterm-1901.