Bustard and Eastin v. Cheatham

Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity

Bustard and Eastin v. Cheatham

1 Tenn. 370

CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity

DecidedDecember 6, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tenn. 370 (Bustard and Eastin v. Cheatham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bustard and Eastin v. Cheatham, 1 Tenn. 370 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellees must have judgment; can proceed on the record without process, if brought up at any time during the second term of the superior court, after the appeal was granted. If there had not been an appeal the judgment would not have become dormant within twelve months, and why should we require notice here until after the second term. (5)

(5)

Vid. 1 Hen. and Mun. 21.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellees must have judgment; can proceed on the record without process, if brought up at any time during the second term of the superior court, after the appeal was granted. If there had not been an appeal the judgment would not have become dormant within twelve months, and why should we require notice here until after the second term. (5)

(5)

Vid. 1 Hen. and Mun. 21.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Tenn. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bustard-and-eastin-v-cheatham-tennsuperct-1808.