Bussineau v. Georgetown University

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bussineau v. Georgetown University

532 A.2d 89, 1987 D.C. App. LEXIS 459

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 11, 1987·No. No. 84-1318·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion of appel-lee to stay the mandate and for reconsideration of the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc, 525 A.2d 595, the response of appellant thereto, the request of appellee for leave to reply to the response to the motion, the lodged reply, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave to reply is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply. It is

FURTHER ORDERED on behalf of the division assigned to this case that the motion to stay the mandate is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration of the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion of appel-lee to stay the mandate and for reconsideration of the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc, 525 A.2d 595, the response of appellant thereto, the request of appellee for leave to reply to the response to the motion, the lodged reply, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave to reply is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply. It is

FURTHER ORDERED on behalf of the division assigned to this case that the motion to stay the mandate is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration of the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Bussineau v. Georgetown University, 532 A.2d 89, 1987 D.C. App. LEXIS 459 (D.C. 1987).

Pincite

532 A.2d 89 (Bussineau v. Georgetown University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related