Bussey v. State

674 So. 2d 924, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5910, 1996 WL 295062
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 5, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 674 So. 2d 924 (Bussey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bussey v. State, 674 So. 2d 924, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5910, 1996 WL 295062 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate the order assessing costs against the appellant in accordance with the State’s concession that all discretionary costs assessed in the written order that were not orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing must be stricken. A trial court may impose costs statutorily mandated in a written order even if those costs were not orally announced. See State v. Beasley, 580 So.2d 139 (Fla.1991); Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc). We therefore instruct the trial court on remand to impose $253.00 in statutorily mandated costs. This sum consists of: $200.00 mandated by section 27.3455, Florida Statutes; $50.00 mandated by section 960.20, Florida Statutes; and $3.00 mandated by section 943.25(3), Florida Statutes. The discretionary $2.00 cost pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes, must be stricken because it was not orally announced. See Reyes; Jones v. State, 666 So.2d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

VACATED and remanded for treatment consistent with this opinion.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gardner v. State
699 So. 2d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 So. 2d 924, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5910, 1996 WL 295062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bussey-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.