Home/Ohio Court of Appeals/Bussey v. Maxwell

Bussey v. Maxwell

29 Ohio Law Rep. 46
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 9, 1964
Docket39125
StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ohio Law Rep. 46 (Bussey v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bussey v. Maxwell, 29 Ohio Law Rep. 46 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Ohio Law Rep. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bussey-v-maxwell-ohioctapp-1964.