Bussey v. Barilleaux

133 So. 446, 172 La. 204, 1931 La. LEXIS 1668
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 2, 1931·No. No. 30906.·Published

Opinion

OVERTON, J.

■ This case presents the same issues as the ease of Mrs. Marie S. Bussey v. Wise-Miller (La Sup., No. 30905) 133 So. 443. 1 The only difference .of any consequence whatever 'is that, in this case, judgment was rendered on the face of the pleadings, in favor of plaintiff, on a motion for judgment thereon. The pleadings show that Miss Barilleaux had not acquired title to the property at the time suit was filed, as did the evidence received in No. 30905.

Therefore, for the reasons assigned in that case, the judgment appealed from is set aside, and the case is remanded to be proceeded with not inconsistently with the views therein expressed; the costs of appeal to be paid by plaintiff, the costs of the lower court to abide the final decision of the case.

1

Ante, p. 198.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bussey v. Barilleaux, 133 So. 446, 172 La. 204, 1931 La. LEXIS 1668 (La. 1931).

133 So. 446 (Bussey v. Barilleaux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bussey v. Wise-Miller
133 So. 443 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)