Busselle v. Colonial Condominium Association

Michigan Supreme Court

Busselle v. Colonial Condominium Association

760 N.W.2d 500

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 2009·No. 137671·Published

Opinion

760 N.W.2d 500 (2009)

Jack E. BUSSELLE and Gayle E. Busselle, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendant/Appellants,
v.
COLONIAL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellee, and
Marple & Associates, PLC, John L. Marple, Michael McGreal, Kim Rotz, Karla Sebastiani, Bernard Sherburn, and Dennis Van Dalen, Defendants/Appellees.

Docket No. 137671. COA No. 285841.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 24, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

760 N.W.2d 500 (2009)

Jack E. BUSSELLE and Gayle E. Busselle, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendant/Appellants,
v.
COLONIAL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellee, and
Marple & Associates, PLC, John L. Marple, Michael McGreal, Kim Rotz, Karla Sebastiani, Bernard Sherburn, and Dennis Van Dalen, Defendants/Appellees.

Docket No. 137671. COA No. 285841.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 24, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

Busselle v. Colonial Condominium Association, 760 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

760 N.W.2d 500 (Busselle v. Colonial Condominium Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.