Busselle v. Colonial Condominium Association
760 N.W.2d 500
This text of 760 N.W.2d 500 (Busselle v. Colonial Condominium Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Busselle v. Colonial Condominium Association, 760 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Jack E. BUSSELLE and Gayle E. Busselle, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendant/Appellants,
v.
COLONIAL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellee, and
Marple & Associates, PLC, John L. Marple, Michael McGreal, Kim Rotz, Karla Sebastiani, Bernard Sherburn, and Dennis Van Dalen, Defendants/Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
760 N.W.2d 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/busselle-v-colonial-condominium-association-mich-2009.