Bussell v. Whiddon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bussell v. Whiddon

85 S.E. 684, 16 Ga. App. 470, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 83

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 25, 1915

Docket5845

StatusPublished

This text of 85 S.E. 684 (Bussell v. Whiddon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bussell v. Whiddon, 85 S.E. 684, 16 Ga. App. 470, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 83 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

The assignments of error directed to the insufficiency of the possessory warrant and the antecedent affidavit are not sufficiently specific to present any point for decision. Upon the merits, the finding in favor of the plaintiff in the inferior judicatory seems to have been fully authorized, and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition for* certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, J.

The assignments of error directed to the insufficiency of the possessory warrant and the antecedent affidavit are not sufficiently specific to present any point for decision. Upon the merits, the finding in favor of the plaintiff in the inferior judicatory seems to have been fully authorized, and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition for* certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 S.E. 684, 16 Ga. App. 470, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bussell-v-whiddon-gactapp-1915.