Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bussell v. State

Bussell v. State

701 So. 2d 124, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12539, 1997 WL 689852
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 1997
DocketNo, 96-3275
StatusPublished

This text of 701 So. 2d 124 (Bussell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bussell v. State, 701 So. 2d 124, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12539, 1997 WL 689852 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.

After pleading nolo contendere to conspiracy and trafficking in cocaine, reserving his right to appeal, appellant seeks review of the lower court’s order denying his motion to dismiss. He claims he was entrapped as a matter of law. This contention is plainly without merit. Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993). At best, the testimony and other evidence on this issue created an issue of fact which appellant elected not to submit to a jury.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munoz v. State
629 So. 2d 90 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 So. 2d 124, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12539, 1997 WL 689852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bussell-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.