Bussel v. Freedman

252 S.E.2d 511, 148 Ga. App. 661, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1597
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 9, 1979
Docket57063
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 252 S.E.2d 511 (Bussel v. Freedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bussel v. Freedman, 252 S.E.2d 511, 148 Ga. App. 661, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1597 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal concerns a ruling of the trial judge pertaining to voir dire examination of jurors. The record on this issue consists of post-trial affidavits [662]*662submitted by counsel; however, there is no proper stipulation by the parties of the proceedings. Counsel for appellant waived a recording of the voir dire and did not seek to complete the record at that time. The question presented requires a transcript of the proceedings or a proper stipulation. See Code Ann. § 6-805. In the absence thereof, we may not consider the issue presented. See Lake v. Hicks, 147 Ga. App. 175 (248 SE2d 236).

Argued January 3, 1979 Decided January 9, 1979. Malone & Percilla, Thomas Wm. Malone, Jones & Wilson, Robert P. Wilson, for appellant. T. M. Smith, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Webb and Banke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elliott v. Georgia Baptist Convention
302 S.E.2d 714 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Taurus Productions, Inc. v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc.
270 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 S.E.2d 511, 148 Ga. App. 661, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bussel-v-freedman-gactapp-1979.