Bussel v. Freedman

252 S.E.2d 511, 148 Ga. App. 661, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1597
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 9, 1979·No. 57063·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal concerns a ruling of the trial judge pertaining to voir dire examination of jurors. The record on this issue consists of post-trial affidavits [662] submitted by counsel; however, there is no proper stipulation by the parties of the proceedings. Counsel for appellant waived a recording of the voir dire and did not seek to complete the record at that time. The question presented requires a transcript of the proceedings or a proper stipulation. See Code Ann. § 6-805. In the absence thereof, we may not consider the issue presented. See Lake v. Hicks, 147 Ga. App. 175 (248 SE2d 236).

Argued January 3, 1979 Decided January 9, 1979. Malone & Percilla, Thomas Wm. Malone, Jones & Wilson, Robert P. Wilson, for appellant. T. M. Smith, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Webb and Banke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bussel v. Freedman, 252 S.E.2d 511, 148 Ga. App. 661, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1597 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

252 S.E.2d 511 (Bussel v. Freedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elliott v. Georgia Baptist Convention
302 S.E.2d 714 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Taurus Productions, Inc. v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc.
270 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)