Busse v. St. Louis Blues, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Busse v. St. Louis Blues, Inc.

409 S.W.3d 428, 2013 WL 3146891, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 736

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 2013·No. No. ED 98877·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Brett Busse, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants/respondents. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished ■with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Brett Busse, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants/respondents. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished ■with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Busse v. St. Louis Blues, Inc., 409 S.W.3d 428, 2013 WL 3146891, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 736 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

409 S.W.3d 428 (Busse v. St. Louis Blues, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.