Busny v. Board of Assessors

451 N.E.2d 725, 389 Mass. 654, 1983 Mass. LEXIS 1572
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJuly 11, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 451 N.E.2d 725 (Busny v. Board of Assessors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Busny v. Board of Assessors, 451 N.E.2d 725, 389 Mass. 654, 1983 Mass. LEXIS 1572 (Mass. 1983).

Opinion

O’Connor, J.

Irving S. Busny, trustee (taxpayer), appeals pursuant to G. L. c. 58A, § 13, from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (board) upholding the refusal of the board of assessors of Boston (assessors) to abate real estate taxes assessed on the taxpayer’s property for fiscal year 1980.

On January 1, 1979, the assessment date for fiscal year 1980, see G. L. c. 59, §§ 11, 21, 38, the taxpayer owned a parcel of real estate at 33 Broad Street, Boston. An eleven-story commercial building stood on the parcel, which measured approximately 3,680 square feet. The assessors valued the property at $320,000, and assessed a tax thereon in the amount of $80,928, based on a rate of $252.90 per thousand dollars of value. The taxpayer’s application for an abatement of the tax was denied by the assessors, and [655]*655the taxpayer appealed to the board. After a hearing, the board issued a decision for the assessors, and thereafter issued its findings of fact and report.

The taxpayer’s contention before the board and before this court is that the assessed value of the property for fiscal year 1980 was excessive. In support of this claim, the taxpayer introduced at the hearing before the board a copy of a decision of the board which granted the taxpayer an abatement of taxes assessed on the property for fiscal year 1979. The abatement was granted because the taxpayer’s property had been assessed at a higher percentage of fair cash value than had other classes of property in the city.

The board calculated the taxpayer’s abatement for fiscal year 1979 by determining the fair cash value of the taxpayer’s property, and then reducing that value to 22.4%, which was the percentage of fair cash value at which the most favored class of property had been assessed. See Keniston v. Assessors of Boston, 380 Mass. 888, 906 (1980); Tregor v. Assessors of Boston, 377 Mass. 602, 602, 609-612, cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 (1979); Assessors of Weymouth v. Curtis, 375 Mass. 493, 501 (1978); Shoppers’ World, Inc. v. Assessors of Framingham, 348 Mass. 366, 377-378 n.10 (1965) (dictum).1 The fair cash value of the property as determined by the board was $346,784. The property’s value as adjusted for disproportionate assessment was $77,680. In its fiscal year 1980 appeal, the taxpayer simply rested on the board’s determination of the property’s value for fiscal year 1979, and introduced no additional evidence of value.

As in Beal v. Assessors of Boston, ante 648 (1983), also decided today, the taxpayer’s appeal is grounded on the contention that G. L. c. 58A, § 12A, inserted by St. 1943, c. 430, applies to this case,2 and that, consequently, the [656]*656assessors had the burden of satisfying the board that the assessed value of the property was warranted. The taxpayer contends that that burden was not satisfied. The taxpayer concedes that if § 12A does not apply, his appeal must fail. This is because, in appeals to which § 12A does not apply, “the taxpayer bears the burden of proof on the issue of overvaluation.” Foxboro Assocs. v. Assessors of Foxborough, 385 Mass. 679, 684 (1982). The taxpayer in this case presented no evidence of overvaluation.

In Beal, supra, we ruled that G. L. c. 58A, § 12A, inserted by St. 1943, c. 430, applies only to those cases in which the assessed value of the taxpayer’s property is greater than the board’s unadjusted determination of the property’s value during the three-year period described by § 12A. Section 12A does not apply to the taxpayer’s appeal because the assessed value of the property was $320,000, and the board’s prior unadjusted determination of value was $346,784. Consequently, the taxpayer’s appeal must fail.

The decision of the Appellate Tax Board is affirmed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SHOPPERS'WORLD v. Board of Assessors of Framingham
203 N.E.2d 811 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1965)
Tregor v. Board of Assessors of Boston
387 N.E.2d 538 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1979)
Board of Assessors v. Curtis
378 N.E.2d 655 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
Keniston v. Board of Assessors
407 N.E.2d 1275 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1980)
Foxboro Associates v. Board of Assessors
433 N.E.2d 890 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 N.E.2d 725, 389 Mass. 654, 1983 Mass. LEXIS 1572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/busny-v-board-of-assessors-mass-1983.