Busker Alley, Inc. v. Kasperbauer

Opinion

3 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OR GUAM 4 BUSKER ALLEY, INC. and JAE JI, ) 5 ) Plaintiffs. ) CASE NO. CVI081-12 6 ) 7 v. ) DECISION AND ORDER 8 ) RE: MOTION FOR ) DISQUALIFICATION 9 LAWRENCE KASPERBAUER and ) DOES 1-50, ) 10 ) II Defendants, ) ) 12

13 INTRODUCTION 14

15 This matter came before the Honorable Alberto C. Lamorena, III, on October 16 17, 2012 on Plaintiffs' Objection to this Court presiding over the proceedings. 17 Attorney Vanessa Ji represented Plaintiffs Busker Alley, Inc. and Jae Ji. Attorney

18 Mitchell F. Thompson represented Defendants. The Court now issues its Decision

19 and Order.

21 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 22 On October 3, 2012, this Court issued its Notice of DisqualifYing Facts

23 pursuant to 7 G.C.A. §§ 6105- 6106. On October 17, 2012, Plaintiffs filed their

24 motion to disqualifY this Court from presiding over the above-captioned matter.

25 There is no opposition to the motion. 26 II 27 II 28 Decision and Order Case No. CVIOSI-12

CONCLUSION 2 There being no opposition to the Motion to Disqualify the Court from the 3 above-captioned matter, Defendants' Motion is hereby GRANTED and the matter 4 will be put before another Court pursuant to 7 G.C.A. § 6107. 5

6 It is SO ORDERED this 25th day of Octo be ,2012. 7

10 HONORABLE ALBE Presiding Judge, S 11

ORIGINAl"