Busken v. Pulitzer, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Busken v. Pulitzer, Inc.

296 S.W.3d 487, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1325, 2009 WL 3050918

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 22, 2009

DocketED 92655

StatusPublished

This text of 296 S.W.3d 487 (Busken v. Pulitzer, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Busken v. Pulitzer, Inc., 296 S.W.3d 487, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1325, 2009 WL 3050918 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment in defendants’ favor in his action for damages for breach of his St. Louis Post-Dispatch Suburban Distributor Service Agreement. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI