Business Bank of St. Louis v. Centrue Bank

330 S.W.3d 495, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 261
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 9, 2010·No. ED 93532·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Business Bank of St. Louis appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Centrue Bank on Business Bank’s unjust enrichment claim. We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Centrue.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Business Bank of St. Louis v. Centrue Bank, 330 S.W.3d 495, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 261 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

330 S.W.3d 495 (Business Bank of St. Louis v. Centrue Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. State
330 S.W.3d 495 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)