Busiello v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Assn.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Busiello v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Assn.

58 A.D.2d 639, 395 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12714

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.2d 639 (Busiello v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Assn.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Busiello v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Assn., 58 A.D.2d 639, 395 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action on a policy of fire insurance, defendant New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association appeals as limited by its brief, from so much of a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 2, 1976, as, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of plaintiff-respondent and against it. Resettled judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. We find that the testimony adduced at the trial adequately supports the valuations set by the court. We have examined appellant’s remaining contentions, and find them to be without merit. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action on a policy of fire insurance, defendant New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association appeals as limited by its brief, from so much of a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 2, 1976, as, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of plaintiff-respondent and against it. Resettled judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. We find that the testimony adduced at the trial adequately supports the valuations set by the court. We have examined appellant’s remaining contentions, and find them to be without merit. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 639, 395 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/busiello-v-new-york-property-insurance-underwriting-assn-nyappdiv-1977.