Busick v. Barger
This text of 102 N.E.2d 499 (Busick v. Barger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a temporary receiver without notice in cause number 4587 entitled Gene Barger, et al. v. Caleb A. Busick, et al., filed in the Spencer Circuit Court. The appellees have filed no brief in answer to appellants’ brief, which under our decisions, has the effect of confessing the errors asserted by appellants. Meadows v. Hickman (1947), 225 Ind. 146, 73 N. E. 2d 343, and cases therein cited. This makes the order subject to reversal by this court.
[199]*199Moreover, on December 13, 1951, this court; in an opinion by Judge Jasper, decided the trial judge had no jurisdiction to appoint the temporary receiver in-this cause, and ordered the temporary writ of prohibition made permanent. State ex rel. Busick, et al. v. Ewing, Judge, et al. (1951), 230 Ind. 188, 102 N. E. 2d 370. This became the law of this case in this appeal. State ex rel. Joint County Park Board of Ripley, Dearborn and Decatur Counties v. Verbarg (1950), 228 Ind. 280, 91 N. E. 2d 916.
The interlocutory order appointing a receiver without notice is reversed.
Note.—Reported in 102 N. E. 2d 499.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 N.E.2d 499, 230 Ind. 198, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/busick-v-barger-ind-1951.