Bushnell v. Wood

85 Ill. 88
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The chattel mortgage given by Mrs. D. K. Dodge to plaintiff, covering the property in controversy, was regularly executed, acknowledged and recorded, and whether it was fraudulent as to creditors was a question of fact, upon which the evidence is quite conflicting, "and it was, therefore, a proper case for the consideration of a jury. Under instructions from the court sufficiently accurate, the jury found the mortgage was not fraudulent, and being older than the execution under which the property was seized by defendants, it was the prior lien and must prevail.

Declarations made by the mortgagor at the time she was executing the mortgage, were a part of the res gestee, and were admissible in evidence.

That the property was in possession of defendants we do not entertain the slightest doubt, under the evidence in the record.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bushnell v. Wood, 85 Ill. 88 (Ill. 1877).

85 Ill. 88 (Bushnell v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kopf v. Yordy
200 Ill. App. 409 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1916)
Johnston v. Spoonheim
123 N.W. 830 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1909)
Albion State Bank v. Knickerbocker
84 N.W. 311 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1900)
State ex rel. Mundy v. Andrews
19 S.E. 385 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1894)