Bushnell v. Lininger
This text of 383 P.2d 774 (Bushnell v. Lininger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for the taking of gravel by defendant from land alleged to be owned by plaintiffs. Defendant, Douglas county, answered claiming title to the land in question and affirmatively prayed that its title be quieted. The ease was tried on the issue of title. The trial court found for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from the decree entered.
This case presents purely factual issues. The facts are of interest only to the parties. There was more than one basis for reaching the decision made by the trial court. At the conclusion of the trial the trial judge fully explained the reasons for his findings. We concur with the reasons stated and the findings made.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
383 P.2d 774, 235 Or. 59, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bushnell-v-lininger-or-1963.