Bushnell v. Insurance Co. of North America

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Bushnell v. Insurance Co. of North America

444 So. 2d 796, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 7996

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 1, 1984

DocketNo. 83-699

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 444 So. 2d 796 (Bushnell v. Insurance Co. of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bushnell v. Insurance Co. of North America, 444 So. 2d 796, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 7996 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

STOKER, Judge.

This appeal involves the same issues and procedural history described in our opinion rendered this day in Freeman, et al v. Insurance Company of North America, 444 So.2d 793 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1974), our docket number 83-426. On May 23, 1983, the trial court signed a judgment in this case granting the motion for summary judgment filed by INA and dismissing the action as to INA. The judgment was similar to the April 18, 1983, consolidated judgment which dismissed the Emma Williams Freeman suit and others. Jimmy Roy Bushnell appealed in this matter from the dismissal of his suit in the judgment of June 23, 1983.

For the reasons given in the opinion in the Emma Williams Freeman suit mentioned above, the judgment of the trial court dated April 18, 1983, dismissing appellant Bushnell’s action is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to Bushnell.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STOKER, Judge.

This appeal involves the same issues and procedural history described in our opinion rendered this day in Freeman, et al v. Insurance Company of North America, 444 So.2d 793 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1974), our docket number 83-426. On May 23, 1983, the trial court signed a judgment in this case granting the motion for summary judgment filed by INA and dismissing the action as to INA. The judgment was similar to the April 18, 1983, consolidated judgment which dismissed the Emma Williams Freeman suit and others. Jimmy Roy Bushnell appealed in this matter from the dismissal of his suit in the judgment of June 23, 1983.

For the reasons given in the opinion in the Emma Williams Freeman suit mentioned above, the judgment of the trial court dated April 18, 1983, dismissing appellant Bushnell’s action is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to Bushnell.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 So. 2d 796, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 7996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bushnell-v-insurance-co-of-north-america-lactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack