Bushnell v. Dumbeck
This text of 121 P. 6 (Bushnell v. Dumbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The only question is whether the parties ever agreed upon the location of a water right which was to be reserved to the grantor. If that was never settled upon and agreed, there was no complete meeting of minds upon the conditions of the sale, and therefore no agreement which can be specifically enforced.
We have carefully considered the testimony, and conclude that the findings of the circuit court are in accordance therewith. The law applicable to the facts as we find them is too well settled to require discussion, and it is needless to enter into a detailed analysis of the testimony which would consume much space in the reports and be of no permanent value or interest to anybody.
The decree is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 P. 6, 61 Or. 114, 1912 Ore. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bushnell-v-dumbeck-or-1912.