Bushman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bushman v. State

1982 OK CR 101, 648 P.2d 47, 1982 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 299

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 1, 1982

DocketNo. F-80-612

StatusPublished

This text of 1982 OK CR 101 (Bushman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bushman v. State, 1982 OK CR 101, 648 P.2d 47, 1982 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 299 (Okla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinions

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

James R. Bushman, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, was tried before a jury in Pittsburg County District Court for the offense of Forgery in the Second Degree, After Former Conviction of a Felony. He was convicted and sentenced to ten (10) years’ imprisonment. From this judgment and sentence he now appeals.

This case must be reversed and remanded because it affirmatively appears in the record that the trial judge in his opening statements to the prospective jury panel referred to the fact that the appellant was standing trial after formerly being convicted of a felony. This Court has repeatedly held that it is reversible error for a district attorney to refer to a defendant’s prior convictions in his opening statement. Salisbury v. State, 487 P.2d 741 (Okl.Cr.1971); Sloan v. State, 503 P.2d 580 (Okl.Cr.1972); Baeza v. State, 478 P.2d 903 (Okl.Cr.1970). We find it to be no less offensive to the bifurcated trial system when the trial judge rather than the prosecutor so refers to the defendant’s prior convictions. 22 O.S.1981, § 860(a).

As reversal is in order on this basis, it is not necessary to address the other issues raised in the appeal.

The judgment and sentence should be reversed and a new trial granted.

The Honorable Tom R. Cornish filed his disqualification in the above styled and numbered matter, and the Honorable Lavern Fishel, District Judge of the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District, was appointed to serve in his stead.

BUSSEY, J., dissents. FISHEL, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

James R. Bushman, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, was tried before a jury in Pittsburg County District Court for the offense of Forgery in the Second Degree, After Former Conviction of a Felony. He was convicted and sentenced to ten (10) years’ imprisonment. From this judgment and sentence he now appeals.

This case must be reversed and remanded because it affirmatively appears in the record that the trial judge in his opening statements to the prospective jury panel referred to the fact that the appellant was standing trial after formerly being convicted of a felony. This Court has repeatedly held that it is reversible error for a district attorney to refer to a defendant’s prior convictions in his opening statement. Salisbury v. State, 487 P.2d 741 (Okl.Cr.1971); Sloan v. State, 503 P.2d 580 (Okl.Cr.1972); Baeza v. State, 478 P.2d 903 (Okl.Cr.1970). We find it to be no less offensive to the bifurcated trial system when the trial judge rather than the prosecutor so refers to the defendant’s prior convictions. 22 O.S.1981, § 860(a).

As reversal is in order on this basis, it is not necessary to address the other issues raised in the appeal.

The judgment and sentence should be reversed and a new trial granted.

The Honorable Tom R. Cornish filed his disqualification in the above styled and numbered matter, and the Honorable Lavern Fishel, District Judge of the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District, was appointed to serve in his stead.

BUSSEY, J., dissents. FISHEL, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1982 OK CR 101, 648 P.2d 47, 1982 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bushman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1982.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack