Bushfan v. Gluck

158 N.E.2d 132, 339 Mass. 772, 1959 Mass. LEXIS 912
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 1, 1959·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. There was evidence that the plaintiff on March 3, 1955, hired an apartment from the defendant. She observed a piano which had been abandoned in the apartment by a previous tenant. There was evidence also that the defendant had agreed to remove it. The plaintiff moved in on April 8, 1955. The piano had been partially dismantled; its front legs removed. It was leaning against the wall with the strings facing the room. On May 10, 1955, one of the plaintiff’s children, nineteen months of age, was [773]*773crushed to death when the piano toppled over. The judge properly directed a verdict for the defendant. Assuming that the defendant agreed to remove the piano, there was no evidence that the defendant or his agent undertook its removal or in fact that he did anything to cause it to fall. Conahan v. Fisher, 233 Mass. 234. Prushensky v. Pucilowski, 269 Mass. 477. Bergeron v. Forest, 233 Mass. 382. Cormier v. Weiner, 277 Mass. 518. Marcus v. Griggs, Inc. 334 Mass. 139.

William H. Diamond, for the plaintiff. Will J. Bangs, {Claude R. Branch with him,) for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bushfan v. Gluck, 158 N.E.2d 132, 339 Mass. 772, 1959 Mass. LEXIS 912 (Mass. 1959).

158 N.E.2d 132 (Bushfan v. Gluck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Garwacki
402 N.E.2d 1045 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1980)
DiMarzo v. S. & P. REALTY CORP.
306 N.E.2d 432 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1974)
Carey v. Sardinha
38 Mass. App. Dec. 165 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1967)