Bush v. Ulep
This text of Bush v. Ulep (Bush v. Ulep) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6478
BERNARD BUSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BENJAMIN J. ULEP, Medical Doctor,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00053-RBS-FBS)
Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: June 2, 2008
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Bush, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Bernard Bush appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and his motion
filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Bush v. Ulep, No.
2:08-cv-00053-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2008; Mar. 18, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bush v. Ulep, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-ulep-ca4-2008.