Bush v. State

78 S.W.2d 625, 127 Tex. Crim. 549, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 29
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 23, 1935
DocketNo. 17418
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 78 S.W.2d 625 (Bush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bush v. State, 78 S.W.2d 625, 127 Tex. Crim. 549, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 29 (Tex. 1935).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Accompanying the record is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the court stenographer to prepare a statement of facts and deliver it to the appellant. As we understand the record, the statement of facts was prepared but never delivered to the appellant because he claimed he was unable to pay for it. Upon the record before us we are constrained to order a reversal of the judgment for the reason that the appellant was improperly denied a statement of facts, the time for the preparation of same having now expired. Precedents upon the subject are collated in Tex. Jur., vol. 4, p. 413.

[550]*550Other questions of a serious nature are presented by bills of exception, but in view of the disposition made of the appeal, a discussion of them is pretermitted.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melendez v. State
936 S.W.2d 287 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
E. L. Little v. State
97 S.W.2d 479 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.W.2d 625, 127 Tex. Crim. 549, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-state-texcrimapp-1935.