Bush v. State
This text of 471 P.2d 207 (Bush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
On appeal Maxie Bush alleges that the search of the auto on June 5, 1969 which occurred immediately after his arrest was improper under Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). Just recently this court in Derouen v. Sheriff, 85 Nev. 637, 461 P.2d 865 (1969), held that the rule in Chimel was to have only prospective application, therefore, any search occurring prior to the announcement of the Chimel decision on June 23, 1969 is to be governed by the case law existing at that time. Williams v. United States, 418 F.2d 159, 162 (9th Cir. 1969); People v. Edwards, 458 P.2d 713, 720 (Cal. 1969). As a result the search in this case was in all respects proper and the conviction will be affirmed. Johnson v. State, 86 Nev. 52, 464 [511]*511P.2d 465 (1970); Robertson v. State, 84 Nev. 559, 445 P.2d 352 (1968); People v. Bauer, 461 P.2d 637 (Cal. 1969).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 P.2d 207, 86 Nev. 510, 1970 Nev. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-state-nev-1970.