Bush v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bush v. State

79 So. 3d 152, 2012 WL 280259, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1344

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 2012

Docket3D11-3255

StatusPublished

This text of 79 So. 3d 152 (Bush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bush v. State, 79 So. 3d 152, 2012 WL 280259, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1344 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 was denied by the trial court. Because the defendant is challenging his conviction rather than his sentence, we treat his motion as a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g., Rivas v. State, 43 So.3d 154, 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). The motion, pursuant to this Court’s precedent in Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), was legally insufficient on its face and thus properly denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 was denied by the trial court. Because the defendant is challenging his conviction rather than his sentence, we treat his motion as a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g., Rivas v. State, 43 So.3d 154, 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). The motion, pursuant to this Court’s precedent in Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), was legally insufficient on its face and thus properly denied.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 So. 3d 152, 2012 WL 280259, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack