Bush v. State

79 So. 3d 152, 2012 WL 280259, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1344
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bush v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15242
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 2012·No. 3D11-3255·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 was denied by the trial court. Because the defendant is challenging his conviction rather than his sentence, we treat his motion as a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g., Rivas v. State, 43 So.3d 154, 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). The motion, pursuant to this Court’s precedent in Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), was legally insufficient on its face and thus properly denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bush v. State, 79 So. 3d 152, 2012 WL 280259, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1344 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

79 So. 3d 152 (Bush v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Little v. State
77 So. 3d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Rivas v. State
43 So. 3d 154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)