Bush v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bush v. State

686 So. 2d 672, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12929, 1996 WL 711190

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 12, 1996

DocketNo. 95-4258

StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 672 (Bush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bush v. State, 686 So. 2d 672, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12929, 1996 WL 711190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, we find no merit to appellant’s claim that the trial court should have granted her motion for judgment of acquittal. However, we remand with directions that the trial court clarify the court costs it intended to impose and, to the extent required by law, identify the statutory basis therefor.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, we find no merit to appellant’s claim that the trial court should have granted her motion for judgment of acquittal. However, we remand with directions that the trial court clarify the court costs it intended to impose and, to the extent required by law, identify the statutory basis therefor.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

686 So. 2d 672, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12929, 1996 WL 711190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.