Bush v. State

537 So. 2d 714, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 364, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 1989 WL 7507

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bush v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 543 So. 2d 283 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1989·No. No. 87-1950·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, William Joseph Bush, raises two points in this appeal.

The first concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the defendant’s conviction of manslaughter. We find the evidence on manslaughter sufficient, and we reject this point.

The second point raised is that the judgment erroneously refers to manslaughter as a first degree felony, whereas manslaughter is a second degree felony. We agree.

Remanded for correction of the judgment. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, William Joseph Bush, raises two points in this appeal.

The first concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support the defendant’s conviction of manslaughter. We find the evidence on manslaughter sufficient, and we reject this point.

The second point raised is that the judgment erroneously refers to manslaughter as a first degree felony, whereas manslaughter is a second degree felony. We agree.

Remanded for correction of the judgment. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Bush v. State, 537 So. 2d 714, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 364, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 1989 WL 7507 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

537 So. 2d 714 (Bush v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.