Bush v. State
111 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 662
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bush v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Ala. App. 486 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by. having whisky in his possession. We have read the entire evidence, and it was ample to support the verdict returned. The few exceptions reserved on the taking of testimony have each been examined, and in 'each 'instance we find the ruling of the court without error. There is no error in the record’, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bush v. State, 111 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 662 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).
111 So. 924 (Bush v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.