Bush v. Jones

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 9, 2004
• Docket: 04-6141
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6141

LARRY LAMONT BUSH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ELLSWORTH JONES, Det. 4444; TIM HOLEVAS, Ofcr/Det #1041,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 02263-01-AMD)

Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: July 9, 2004

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Lamont Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara McFaul Cook, County Solicitor, Louis Paul Ruzzi, Carol Saffran-Brinks, COUNTY SOLICITOR’S OFFICE, Ellicott City, Maryland, Andrew Jensen Murray, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Larry Lamont Bush seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Bush v. Jones, No. CA-03-02263-01-AMD (D. Md. filed

Jan. 5, 2004, entered Jan. 6, 2004). We deny the motion for

appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -