Bush v. Jones

Fourth Circuit

Bush v. Jones

102 F. App'x 337

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 9, 2004·No. No. 04-6141·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry Lamont Bush seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bush v. Jones, No. CA-03-02263-01AMD (D. Md. filed Jan. 5, 2004, entered Jan. 6, 2004). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Larry Lamont Bush seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bush v. Jones, No. CA-03-02263-01AMD (D. Md. filed Jan. 5, 2004, entered Jan. 6, 2004). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bush v. Jones, 102 F. App'x 337 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

102 F. App'x 337 (Bush v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related