Bush v. Hertz Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bush v. Hertz Corp.

29 A.D.2d 938, 289 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4179

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 938 (Bush v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bush v. Hertz Corp., 29 A.D.2d 938, 289 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered January 15, 1968, granting plaintiff a trial preference pursuant to CPLR 3403, unanimously reversed, on the facts and law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements. Plaintiff is a resident of New Jersey; the accident happened in Demarest, New Jersey. Defendant Hertz Corporation is a Delaware corporation, licensed to do business in both New York and New Jersey. Defendants Greenbaum Bros, are a partnership having their place of business in New Jersey only. Where plaintiff is a resident of New Jersey, the accident happened in that State, and the defendants are licensed to do business or have their place of business in New Jersey, plaintiff could have brought the action in New Jersey. In these circumstances, we do not think plaintiff should be granted a preference over other causes on our calendar. (Defina v. Lehigh Val. B. B. Co., 211 App. Div. 870; Burton v. Long Is. B. B. Co., 89 N. Y. S. 2d 583; Tufts v. National Transp. Co., 87 N. Y. S. 2d 762.) Concur— Stevens, J. P., Steuer, McGivern, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered January 15, 1968, granting plaintiff a trial preference pursuant to CPLR 3403, unanimously reversed, on the facts and law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements. Plaintiff is a resident of New Jersey; the accident happened in Demarest, New Jersey. Defendant Hertz Corporation is a Delaware corporation, licensed to do business in both New York and New Jersey. Defendants Greenbaum Bros, are a partnership having their place of business in New Jersey only. Where plaintiff is a resident of New Jersey, the accident happened in that State, and the defendants are licensed to do business or have their place of business in New Jersey, plaintiff could have brought the action in New Jersey. In these circumstances, we do not think plaintiff should be granted a preference over other causes on our calendar. (Defina v. Lehigh Val. B. B. Co., 211 App. Div. 870; Burton v. Long Is. B. B. Co., 89 N. Y. S. 2d 583; Tufts v. National Transp. Co., 87 N. Y. S. 2d 762.) Concur— Stevens, J. P., Steuer, McGivern, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 938, 289 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-hertz-corp-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack