Bush v. E. H. Cottrell, Inc.

33 A.D.2d 983, 307 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5750
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1970·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The information gathered by plaintiffs’ attorney, consisting of statements made by an automobile mechanic who examined a ear owned by one of the plaintiffs, is material prepared for litigation. However, since it can no longer be duplicated and withholding it would result in injustice or undue hardship to the defendant, the plaintiffs should be required to produce it. (CPLR 3101, subd, [d]; cf. Clarke v. First Presbyterian Church of East Aurora, 30 A D 2d 763, Brunswick Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 27 A D 2d 182.) (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term vacating notice to discover and inspect.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Witmer, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bush v. E. H. Cottrell, Inc., 33 A.D.2d 983, 307 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

33 A.D.2d 983 (Bush v. E. H. Cottrell, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kellar v. Vassar Bros. Hospital
105 A.D.2d 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Morrison v. Ellis
91 A.D.2d 1172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. FMC Corp.
90 Misc. 2d 876 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)